DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081423P.pdf   08/17/2009  United States  v.  Northshore Mining Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1423
                          and No:  08-1529
                          and No:  08-1533
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with John R. Gibson and Bye,
   Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Environmental law. Northshore received all of the relief it sought in its motion to dissolve the injunction in the case, and it lacked standing to appeal the order; nor did Northshore have standing to appeal the district court's collateral ruling denying its Rule 60(b) motion as the court's ruling on that motion was immaterial to the ultimate ruling vacating the injunction; the United States' appeal must also be dismissed because it was not aggrieved by the district court's order since its interest did not extend to air-emissions programs and the order involved only affects air emissions; with respect to the remaining appeal by Minnesota and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, those parties have failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by vacating sua sponte the injunction's air-emissions programs as the state and the agency have sufficient regulatory tools to monitor and control the plant's fibre emissions in ways which parallel the injunction.