DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081518P.pdf   12/22/2008  United States  v.  Kamron Dehghani
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1518
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Melloy and Beam, Circuit
   Judges]
Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. District court did not err in denying motion to suppress confession given during interrogation and after Miranda warnings issued, as findings that detectives did not overcome defendant's will and statements were made voluntarily were not clearly erroneous. District court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to recuse, as district court concluded defendant's threat against him was an effort to manipulate the criminal justice system, defendant lacked capacity to carry out threat against him, and the average observer would not reasonably question the court's impartiality. Although sentence was above the guidelines range, the record shows district court considered the section 3553(a) factors, adequately explained the sentence, and properly considered the attempts to obstruct justice. Thus, no procedural error existed. District court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence, as sentence was substantively reasonable.