DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
081587P.pdf 05/20/2009 Khalid Ibrahimi v. Michael B. Mukasey
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-1587
Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Benton, Circuit Judge, and
Magnuson, District Judge]
Petition for review - Immigration. In deciding a request for a good-
faith-marriage waiver, the BIA properly placed the burden on petitioner
to show that he entered into the marriage in good faith; since eligibility
for discretionary relief is a question of law or the application of law to
facts, the court has jurisdiction to review the decision to deny the waiver
on the basis that petitioner had failed to establish a good-faith marriage;
the agency's conclusion of law - that petitioner's credited evidence did
not satisfy the legal standard of what constitutes a good-faith marriage - is
reviewed de novo; the credited evidence supported the BIA's decision
that petitioner did not enter into his marriage in good faith, and the BIA
did not err in concluding he was ineligible for the good-faith-marriage
waiver; because petitioner did not have a liberty interest in obtaining
discretionary relief from removal, he had no due-process right, and the
court is without jurisdiction to consider his due process claims.