DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081587P.pdf   05/20/2009  Khalid Ibrahimi  v.  Michael B. Mukasey
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1587
   Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Benton, Circuit Judge, and
   Magnuson, District Judge]
Petition for review - Immigration. In deciding a request for a good- faith-marriage waiver, the BIA properly placed the burden on petitioner to show that he entered into the marriage in good faith; since eligibility for discretionary relief is a question of law or the application of law to facts, the court has jurisdiction to review the decision to deny the waiver on the basis that petitioner had failed to establish a good-faith marriage; the agency's conclusion of law - that petitioner's credited evidence did not satisfy the legal standard of what constitutes a good-faith marriage - is reviewed de novo; the credited evidence supported the BIA's decision that petitioner did not enter into his marriage in good faith, and the BIA did not err in concluding he was ineligible for the good-faith-marriage waiver; because petitioner did not have a liberty interest in obtaining discretionary relief from removal, he had no due-process right, and the court is without jurisdiction to consider his due process claims.