DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081755P.pdf   03/05/2009  United States  v.  Mohamad Elzahabi
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1755
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law. Where FBI agents never restrained or handcuffed defendant, regularly reminded him that his participation was voluntary and repeatedly advised him he was free to leave, the district court did not err in finding defendant was not in custody during the session and that the statements he made were admissible even though he never received a Miranda warning; failure to Mirandize defendant before this first interview session did not taint subsequent interrogations; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for knowingly possessing and using a fraudulently obtained immigration document.