DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
081842P.pdf 04/20/2009 Kerubo F. Hanggi, etc. v. Michael B. Mukasey, etc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-1842
Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Bright and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Petition for review - Immigration. Issue concerning request for a
continuance was not properly before the court as petitioner failed to raise
the issue before the BIA; it would appear under related precedents that
the court does not have authority to consider the issue of whether the
Immigration Judge erred in denying petitioner's motion to terminate
removal proceedings; assuming the court does have such jurisdiction, the
Immigration Judge did not abuse her discretion in denying the request.
Judge Bright, Concurring, and suggesting the Immigration Service should
stay petitioner's removal pending the outcome of her appeal from the
denial of her I-30 petition.