DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082034P.pdf   04/15/2009  Omar Yanez  v.  State of Minnesota
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2034
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Benton,
   Circuit Judge]
   Prisoner case - habeas. State courts did not unreasonably apply clearly
   established Supreme Court precedent in ruling that admission of victim's
   out-of-court testimonial statements did not violate Yanez's Sixth
   Amendment rights, as the victim appeared at trial, testified and was
   subject to cross-examination; the victim's inability to remember the
   details of her prior statements did not render admission of the statements
   constitutionally defective.