DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082147P.pdf   04/23/2009  Robert Hunt, Jr.  v.  Robert Houston
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2147
   District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - habeas. District court erred in its handling of a claim related to prosecutor's misconduct, as the Nebraska Supreme Court determined the claim was defaulted because it had not been raised in Hunt's first habeas; in order to overcome a state procedural default finding, Hunt must show either that the ruling resulted from an exorbitant application of an otherwise sound rule, which he had not, or cause and prejudice; Hunt had knowledge of all of the facts surrounding his claim of prosecutorial misconduct, and he could not establish cause for his failure to include it in his first post-conviction filings; nor could Hunt establish prejudice because the statements related to the misconduct were not admitted at trial (the prosecutor removed information that Hunt had requested counsel at the end of his first statement, thereby making the admissibility of his second statement problematical; however, the state told the court and Hunt before trial that it would not introduce the second statement and it did not use the statement at trial); trial counsel's failure to adequately investigate the conduct and report it to ethics authorities did not result in any prejudice; the possibility of prejudice is further undercut by the strength of the state's case, and Hunt has failed to show that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of his trial would have been different; claim that his trial counsel's closing arguments amounted to a complete denial of Hunt's right to counsel was properly rejected by the district court; claim that the state court improperly admitted evidence as a result of the second statement was properly rejected; grant of habeas relief is reversed, and the matter is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.