DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082167P.pdf   07/14/2009  State Auto Property & Casualty  v.  Boardwalk Apartments
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2167
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Melloy, Circuit Judge, and Doty,
   District Judge]
Civil case - Insurance. District court did not err in finding insurance agent did not have any special or expanded agreement with the insured which would have transformed his general duty into an expanded duty; district court properly found that Kansas's Valued Property Law does not apply and that the insurer's liability was not limited to he valuation sheet value of $2.1 million; because the Valued Policy Law does not apply, the coinsurance provision of the policy did apply; provisions of policy stating insurer would not reimburse any replacement cost attributable to enforcement of an ordinance or law was in violation of Kansas public policy and was not enforceable; Missouri's vexatious-refusal-to-pay statute did not apply as Kansas law governs the dispute; Kansas law concerning award of attorneys' fees will apply if insured obtains a judgment in excess of the amount the insurer tendered.