DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
082167P.pdf 07/14/2009 State Auto Property & Casualty v. Boardwalk Apartments
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-2167
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Melloy, Circuit Judge, and Doty,
District Judge]
Civil case - Insurance. District court did not err in finding insurance
agent did not have any special or expanded agreement with the insured
which would have transformed his general duty into an expanded duty;
district court properly found that Kansas's Valued Property Law does not
apply and that the insurer's liability was not limited to he valuation sheet
value of $2.1 million; because the Valued Policy Law does not apply, the
coinsurance provision of the policy did apply; provisions of policy stating
insurer would not reimburse any replacement cost attributable to
enforcement of an ordinance or law was in violation of Kansas public
policy and was not enforceable; Missouri's vexatious-refusal-to-pay
statute did not apply as Kansas law governs the dispute; Kansas law
concerning award of attorneys' fees will apply if insured obtains a
judgment in excess of the amount the insurer tendered.