DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082214P.pdf   09/01/2009  Craftsmen Limousine  v.  Ford Motor Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2214
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - civil procedure. There is no requirement under Fed. R. Civ.
   P. 54 that the district court provide a detailed review or analysis of every
   item of costs; plaintiff failed to offer any specific basis to rebut the
   presumption in favor of awarding Ford costs or for concluding that the
   award was unreasonable or unnecessary; no error in awarding costs for
   video-depositions as such costs are included under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1920;
   no error in awarding pro hac vice costs as they are recoverable as fees of
   the clerk under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1920.