DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082404P.pdf   03/26/2009  United States  v.  Wilmer Scurlark
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2404
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Benton,
   Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in finding it
   lacked authority to modify defendant's crack sentence under 18 U.S.C.
   Sec. 3582(c)(2) to reflect the crack cocaine amendments to the Guidelines
   because defendant had been sentenced under a binding court-approved
   Rule 11(c)(1)C plea agreement; fact that the agreement stipulated to a
   sentencing range rather than a specific number of months did not change
   the result as the rule states the parties may agree to either a specific
   sentence or sentencing range.