DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082511P.pdf   02/02/2009  United States  v.  Warren Patrick Banks, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2511
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit
   Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law. Officers observed defendant committing a petty misdemeanor and this was sufficient to establish reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity, thereby justifying the officers' decision to make an investigatory Terry stop; officers' actions in directing defendant to stop and approach were reasonably related in scope to the misdemeanor offense; several factors showed a reasonable officer would have concluded defendant was armed and dangerous, and officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by conducting a protective frisk; district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to exclude the names of his prior felony offenses as the information was relevant to establishing the elements of the offense of felon in possession of a firearm and the information did not unfairly prejudice the jury against him, especially in light of the court's limiting instruction.