DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

082657P.pdf   08/04/2009  Guillermo E. Ramirez-Peyro  v.  Eric H. Holder, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-2657
   Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Petition for review - Immigration. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Ramirez-Peyro v. Gonzalez, 477 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2007), which remanded the case to the BIA for specific factual findings regarding the plausibility of petitioner's internal relocation to Mexico and the Mexican government's acquiescence to drug traffickers and public official who help them. This circuit adopts the BIA's interpretation of "acting in an official capacity" under 8 C.F.R. Sec. 1208 which defines the phrase as "under color of law;" the BIA too narrowly construed this standard in petitioner's case and erred in applying the standard to the facts because the BIA's conclusion that Mexican police would not be acting in official capacity was based on improper fact finding and an improper statement of the IJ's factual findings regarding the likelihood of petitioner's arrest and whether he had immunity from prosecution in Mexico; in analyzing petitioner's claim that he was entitled to relief under the Convention Against Torture based on the acquiescence of public officials acting in an official capacity to the actions of other persons, the BIA inappropriately limited its analysis to whether law- enforcement officials would acquiesce in their official capacities to the Juarez drug cartel's actions against petitioner; case remanded for further findings.