DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
082657P.pdf 08/04/2009 Guillermo E. Ramirez-Peyro v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-2657
Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Petition for review - Immigration. For the court's prior opinion in the
matter, see Ramirez-Peyro v. Gonzalez, 477 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2007),
which remanded the case to the BIA for specific factual findings
regarding the plausibility of petitioner's internal relocation to Mexico
and the Mexican government's acquiescence to drug traffickers and public
official who help them. This circuit adopts the BIA's interpretation of
"acting in an official capacity" under 8 C.F.R. Sec. 1208 which defines
the phrase as "under color of law;" the BIA too narrowly construed this
standard in petitioner's case and erred in applying the standard to the
facts because the BIA's conclusion that Mexican police would not be
acting in official capacity was based on improper fact finding and an
improper statement of the IJ's factual findings regarding the likelihood
of petitioner's arrest and whether he had immunity from prosecution in
Mexico; in analyzing petitioner's claim that he was entitled to relief
under the Convention Against Torture based on the acquiescence of
public officials acting in an official capacity to the actions of other
persons, the BIA inappropriately limited its analysis to whether law-
enforcement officials would acquiesce in their official capacities to the
Juarez drug cartel's actions against petitioner; case remanded for further
findings.