DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

083022P.pdf   06/23/2009  United States  v.  Edmond Cote
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-3022
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Smith and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case - criminal law. The Fourth Amendment does not require the judge issuing a search warrant to record sworn supplementary oral testimony, and the judge's failure to do so does not violate the Fourth Amendment or prevent meaningful review of the probable cause finding; since this was a state court warrant, sought and executed by state officers, Fed. R. Crim.P. 41(d)(2)(c) does not apply to the analysis.