DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
083107P.pdf 11/16/2009 Phillip Parmley v. Larry Norris
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-3107
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - habeas. Arkansas Court of Appeals is not a state court of
last resort, and the Supreme Court of the United States could not have
reviewed either the affirmance of Parmley's conviction or the denial of
his motion for rehearing; as a result, the expiration of time for seeking
direct review does not include the time period that Parmley could have
filed a petition for certiorari; the statute of limitations for Parmley's
habeas petition began running immediately after the Arkansas Court of
Appeals denied his motion for rehearing, and this petition was not filed
until 390 days after that date; as a result, the district court did not
err in finding the habeas petition was untimely. Judge Gruender,
dissenting.