DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

083138P.pdf   08/27/2009  Rena Heino  v.  Michael J. Astrue
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-3138
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Social Security. ALJ did not err in discounting treating
   physicians' opinions when there was conflicting evidence about
   claimant's ability to perform work; nor did the ALJ err in rejecting
   claimant's subjective complaints based on other evidence about her daily
   activities; record showed the ALJ considered claimant's obesity in
   reaching his decision; hypothetical posed to the vocational expert was not
   erroneous because it excluded the subjective pain allegations the ALJ
   considered to be unsupported by the record.