DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

083229P.pdf   07/07/2009  United States  v.  Quincy Tolliver
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-3229
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Arnold and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in concluding defendant was not eligible for modification of his crack sentence under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582(c) because his applicable Guidelines range was his career offender range and that range had not been lowered by Amendment 706; further, the sentence was not subject to modification as it was explicitly based on a stipulation between the parties and not on a sentencing range that had been subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission.