DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
083723P.pdf 02/08/2010 Elyese Anderson v. Michael Waddle
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-3723
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with John R. Gibson and Murphy,
Circuit Judges]
Civil case - civil rights. District court did not err in denying defendants'
motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity; claim that
the district court did not examine each defendant's conduct individually
is rejected; court lacked jurisdiction to review the defendants' arguments
that plaintiffs adduced insufficient evidence to demonstrate that various
defendants had conspired to harass and intimidate the academy;
plaintiffs' evidence was sufficient to present a case that defendants
violated their clearly established constitutional rights; because the court
finds that the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for
summary judgment based on qualified immunity, the court would not
consider whether the district court abused its broad discretion by
declining to apply the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel.