DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

083723P.pdf   02/08/2010  Elyese Anderson  v.  Michael Waddle
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-3723
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with John R. Gibson and Murphy,
   Circuit Judges]
Civil case - civil rights. District court did not err in denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity; claim that the district court did not examine each defendant's conduct individually is rejected; court lacked jurisdiction to review the defendants' arguments that plaintiffs adduced insufficient evidence to demonstrate that various defendants had conspired to harass and intimidate the academy; plaintiffs' evidence was sufficient to present a case that defendants violated their clearly established constitutional rights; because the court finds that the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, the court would not consider whether the district court abused its broad discretion by declining to apply the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel.