DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

083999P.pdf   03/22/2010  Pinnacle Pizza Company  v.  Little Caesar Enterprises
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-3999
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley and Gruender, Circuit
   Judges]
Civil case - Franchise law. If defendant breached the franchise agreement, it made a single breach in 1997, and plaintiff's breach of contract claims are time-barred; plaintiff's claim under the South Dakota Franchise Act is also time-barred; with respect to the dispute over the use of the phrase "Hot-N-Ready," the franchise agreement expressly authorized the defendant's actions, and they were not deceptive or taken in bad faith; as a result, plaintiff could not prove fraud in defendant's trademark application, and the district court did not err in denying plaintiff's claim for cancellation of defendant's federal trademark for the phrase; district court did not err in finding that plaintiff's actions in trying to cancel defendant's trademark violated the franchise agreement and breached the parties' contract.