DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
083999P.pdf 03/22/2010 Pinnacle Pizza Company v. Little Caesar Enterprises
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-3999
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley and Gruender, Circuit
Judges]
Civil case - Franchise law. If defendant breached the franchise
agreement, it made a single breach in 1997, and plaintiff's breach
of contract claims are time-barred; plaintiff's claim under the
South Dakota Franchise Act is also time-barred; with respect to the
dispute over the use of the phrase "Hot-N-Ready," the franchise
agreement expressly authorized the defendant's actions, and they were
not deceptive or taken in bad faith; as a result, plaintiff could not
prove fraud in defendant's trademark application, and the district
court did not err in denying plaintiff's claim for cancellation of
defendant's federal trademark for the phrase; district court did not
err in finding that plaintiff's actions in trying to cancel defendant's
trademark violated the franchise agreement and breached the parties'
contract.