DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

091283P.pdf   08/25/2010  Jose Favio Molina Jerez  v.  Eric H. Holder, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1283
   Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. With respect to reinstatement-of-removal orders, the court has jurisdiction to review a constitutional claim or a question of law but not the DHS's factual findings or discretionary judgments; applying this standard, the court lacks subject matter over the bulk of Molina's petition; the court could not review the factual determination as to whether Molina applied for ABC benefits on or before December 31, 1991 and could not, therefore, afford Molina special cancellation of removal under NACARA; 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1231(a)(5) (IIRIRIA) does not have impermissible retroactive effect as applied to Molina, and the remainder of his petition for review is denied; once the district court determined it lacked jurisdiction over Molina's related habeas petition, it was required to transfer the case to the court of appeals; upon transfer, the petition is dismissed in accordance with the court's disposition of his petition for review. Judge Wollman, dissenting.