DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

091359P.pdf   01/13/2010  United States  v.  Marcos Munoz
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1359
   District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant was no longer seized once the
   ticketing officer handed him the citation and his rental documents, and as
   defendant was no longer seized his Fourth Amendment rights were not
   violated when the officer obtained defendant's consent to search the
   vehicle; Munoz did not consent to search of his backpack, and the search
   violated his Fourth Amendment rights; however, the district court did not
   err in concluding that the contraband in the backpack would have been
   inevitably discovered and was admissible.