DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

091552P.pdf   09/02/2010  United States  v.  Robert Beale
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1552
                          and No:  09-1556
                          and No:  09-1558
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Beam and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to support defendants' convictions for conspiring to impede a judicial officer in the discharge of her duties and for obstruction of justice; the First Amendment does not protect a true threat, and defendants' convictions did not violate their First Amendment rights; no error in refusing defendant Beale's instructions on his religious beliefs as they were not placed at issue in the trial; district court did not err in determining defendant Beale knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel; district court considered relevant Sec. 3553(a) factors at sentencing; failure to call the judge who was the object of the threats did not violate defendants' Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights.