091596P.pdf   05/07/2010  United States  v.  Pat Garcia
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1596
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Wollman and Hansen,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. Failure to properly advise
   defendant of minimum and maximum terms of supervised release, even
   in light of defendant's assertion that he would not have pleaded guilty had
   he known the correct supervised release term, did not constitute plain
   error, as Garcia did not show the requisite reasonable probability that he
   would not have pleaded guilty but for the error and the error did not
   seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the
   proceedings. District court did not err in making factual findings relating
   to whether he intentionally failed to register as a sex offender in order to
   avoid detection by law enforcement. Sentence was not substantively
   unreasonable.