091740P.pdf   04/06/2010  United States  v.  Bradley Winters
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1740
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with John R. Gibson and Wollman,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - criminal law. For the court's prior opinion in the case,
   see United States v. Winters, 491 F.3d. 918 (8th Cir. 2007). District
   court did not err in denying defendant's pro se renewed motion to
   suppress; search of vehicle was constitutionally reasonable given the
   totality of the circumstances, including a drug dog alert, and because
   there was reason to believe that there was evidence in the car of the crime
   for which defendant had been arrested; district court did not abuse its
   discretion by denying defendant's motion for appointment of an expert on
   drug dogs; district court did not abuse its discretion by denying
   defendant's motion for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence;
   no violation of the speedy trial provisions of the Interstate Agreement on
   Detainers Act occurred.