091759P.pdf   07/13/2010  United States  v.  Michelle Sweeney
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-1759
                          and No:  09-1823
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and
   Benton, Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient
   to support defendants' convictions for assisting in the unauthorized
   reception of cable signals and conspiracy to do so; the evidence was also
   sufficient to show defendants structured their currency transactions to
   avoid cash reporting requirements; any potential violation of Doyle v.
   Ohio (which occurred when an officer inadvertently testified that
   defendant invoked his right to counsel) was harmless beyond a reasonable
   doubt; district court did not err in imposing enhancement under
   Guidelines Sec. 2B5.3; no error in imposing an enhancement under
   Guidelines Sec. 2B5.3(b)(3) for manufacturing an infringing device; no
   error in denying defendant Michelle Sweeney's request for a minimal-
   role reduction; no error in denying her request for a "safe harbor"
   reduction under Guidelines Sec. 2S1.3(b)(3) as she failed to show a
   legitimate source for the funds involved in the currency transactions.