DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

092032P.pdf   06/17/2010  Gerald L. Trooien  v.  Peter Mansour
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-2032
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and John R.
   Gibson, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Securities. In action alleging defendants violated Minnesota securities laws and breached their fiduciary duties when they persuaded plaintiff to invest in their software firm by making misrepresentations about their future revenue, sales contracts and a possible buyout, the district court erred in interpreting the Minnesota securities law by not applying a negligence standard in analyzing plaintiff's claims, and the state securities claims must be remanded for further proceedings under the proper standard; with respect to plaintiff's claims that defendant's actions constituted fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations, the district court did not err in granting defendants summary judgment as the statements did not qualify as misrepresentations or false information under Minnesota law; with respect to plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty, plaintiff failed to show defendants engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a duty, and the district court did not err in granting defendants summary judgment. Chief Judge Riley, concurring in part and dissenting in part.