092121P.pdf   02/10/2010  United States  v.  Michael Ingram
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-2121
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
   [PUBLISHED] [ Bright, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion in the matter
   see United States v. Ingram, 309 Fed. Appx. 66 (8th Cir. 2009). No error
   in denying motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop and
   subsequent search of defendant's apartment, as there was a valid basis
   for the traffic stop and the search of defendant's person was justified by
   officer safety considerations; preliminary jury instruction on evidence
   concerning prior convictions was phrased in terms that the jury may hear
   such evidence and the court cured any prejudice that might have arisen
   from the prosecution's failure to produce such evidence by withdrawing
   the instruction, properly instructing the jury and telling the jury that
   the instruction was withdrawn because it was not supported by the evidence;
   challenge to prior remand rejected; district court did not err in finding
   the government presented sufficient evidence to prove a prior felony
   conviction under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 851