DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

092125P.pdf   04/05/2010  Kathryn Schultz  v.  Windstream Communications
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-2125
   District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - ERISA. District court did not err in granting defendant
   summary judgment on claim plan amendments violated ERISA;
   amendments did not discriminate against plaintiffs on the basis of their
   age.