DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

092988P.pdf   08/05/2010  United States  v.  Jose Alvarado
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-2988
                          and No:  09-3160
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. District court did not err in determining that it was not necessary to proceed with the evidentiary portion of the hearing on defendant Alvarado's motion to withdraw his guilty plea as the court concluded that even if it accepted all of his allegations as true, they failed to provide grounds for withdrawing the plea; no error in imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice based on Alvarado's denial of his previous sworn statements; no error in denying Alvarado safety-valve sentencing when he contradicted his sworn statements and thus failed to show that he provided complete and truthful disclosure; district court correctly calculated defendant Carillo's advisory guidelines range and his sentence was not unreasonable.