DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

093115P.pdf   05/24/2010  Dave Barrett  v.  Rhodia, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-3115
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - North Platte   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, 
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - torts. In toxic tort strict liability action the district
   court did not err in limiting plaintiffs' experts' testimony about
   causation as the testimony was not based on scientific testing or
   exposure analysis and was too speculative to be admitted; since plaintiffs
   could not establish the cause of the injured worker's toxic exposure
   or the concentration of that exposure, the district court did not err
   in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment.