DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

093116P.pdf   01/07/2011  The Weitz Company  v.  MH Washington
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-3116
                          and No:  09-3118
                          and No:  09-3635
                          and No:  09-3649
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Murphy and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Contracts. District court did not err in finding defendant MacKenzie House was jointly and severally liable with defendant MH Washington as the defendants were in a principal-agent relationship; given the ambiguity of a contract provision, it was proper for the jury to resolve the meaning of the terms and decide when the buildings were completed; evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding that plaintiff substantially performed the contract and that defendant breached; evidentiary challenges rejected; award of attorneys' fees, costs and interest against defendant MH Washington affirmed; the district court did not err in denying subcontractor's motion for judgment as a matter of law on partial payment issues as plaintiff's acceptance of partial pay applications did not preclude plaintiff from seeking breach of contract damages; amount of damages awarded was supported by the evidence; evidence did not support the giving of subcontractor's proposed mitigation of damages instruction; attorneys' fees and costs award against subcontractor affirmed.