DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
093473P.pdf 08/26/2010 Susan Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 09-3473
and No: 09-3518
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Hansen and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Family Medical Leave Act. An employer who makes an
affirmative representation that an employee reasonably and detrimentally
believed was a grant of FMLA leave can be estopped from later arguing
that the employee was not in fact entitled to that leave because she did
not suffer a serious health condition; on remand, the district court should
instruct the jury that, in order to return a verdict for plaintiff, it is
required to find that she reasonably believed that defendant represented
that it granted her FMLA leave rather than some other kind of relief; in
order to find for the plaintiff, the jury must find that the employee
reasonably believed, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the
employer's approval was for FMLA leave; given the totality of the
circumstances in this case in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, a
reasonable jury could find that she put her employer on notice that she was
requesting FMLA leave; a jury could reasonably find that it was reasonable
for plaintiff to rely on defendant's representation that leave was
authorized; as a result, defendant was not entitled to judgment as a matter
of law on the issue of estoppel.