DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

093473P.pdf   08/26/2010  Susan Murphy  v.  FedEx National LTL, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-3473
                          and No:  09-3518
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Hansen and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Family Medical Leave Act. An employer who makes an affirmative representation that an employee reasonably and detrimentally believed was a grant of FMLA leave can be estopped from later arguing that the employee was not in fact entitled to that leave because she did not suffer a serious health condition; on remand, the district court should instruct the jury that, in order to return a verdict for plaintiff, it is required to find that she reasonably believed that defendant represented that it granted her FMLA leave rather than some other kind of relief; in order to find for the plaintiff, the jury must find that the employee reasonably believed, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the employer's approval was for FMLA leave; given the totality of the circumstances in this case in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, a reasonable jury could find that she put her employer on notice that she was requesting FMLA leave; a jury could reasonably find that it was reasonable for plaintiff to rely on defendant's representation that leave was authorized; as a result, defendant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of estoppel.