DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

093785P.pdf   01/27/2011  United States  v.  Guy Allen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-3785
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Beam,
   Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - criminal law. In prosecution for possession of illegal machine guns, the court did not clearly err in admitting a video of defendant teaching his mother to fire a machine gun as the evidence was admissible under Rule 404; court did not err in allowing the government to cross-examine defendant about his military service and discharge as defendant opened the door on his military service; Second Amendment does not protect an individual's right to possess a machine gun, and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(o) does not violate defendant's Second Amendment right to bear arms.