DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

093788P.pdf   04/20/2011  United States  v.  Reginald Hubbard
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  09-3788
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. District court did not abuse its
   discretion in denying motion for new trial based on ineffective assistance
   of counsel claim following motion for new trial and evidentiary hearing.
   Defendant was advised of his right to testify and waived his right to
   testify by remaining silent at trial. District court's finding that 
   defendant's testimony at evidentiary hearing was not credible was not clearly
   erroneous. District court did not abuse its discretion in imposing 96-
   month sentence, the top of the applicable Guidelines range.