DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

101178P.pdf   11/12/2010  United States of America  v.  Angelo Mancini, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-1178
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Beam and Benton, Circuit
   Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The loss resulting from a mortgage fraud
   includes the loss to the mortgage insurer, and the district court did not err
   in including the insurer's payments to the defrauded mortgage company
   in determining the amount of loss; district court did not err in ordering
   defendant to make restitution to the mortgage insurer, as it was a victim
   for purposes of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act.