101544P.pdf   05/17/2012  United States  v.  Randall Replogle
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-1544
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Melloy,
   Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion in the matter,
   see U.S. v. Replogle, 628 F. 3d 1026 (8th Cir. 2011). On remand from the
   Supreme Court of the United States for further consideration n light of
   Tapia v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2382 (2011). Defendant is not entitled
   to relief under Tapia as he did not raise an argument in this court
   regarding 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582(c) until the filing of his petition for
   rehearing and he cannot meet the plain-error standard for relief in any
   event; the court's opinion of January 11, 2011, remains in force and the
   district court's judgment is affirmed.
  
101544P.pdf   01/11/2011  United States  v.  Randall Replogle
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-1544
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and
   Melloy, Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. No error in imposing an enhancement for
   obstruction of justice where defendant did not object to the factual
   statements upon which the enhancement was based; in any event, the
   evidence supported a finding that defendant attempted to unlawfully
   influence a witness; no error in imposing a vulnerable victim
   enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3A1.1(b)(1); district court adequately
   explained its reasons for imposing a 360-month sentence and the sentence
   was not unreasonable.