DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
101665P.pdf 03/31/2011 Charity Wierman v. Casey's General Stores
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 10-1665
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Chief Judge Riley and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - employment discrimination. Employee's evidence neither
undermines nor permits a reasonable inference that employer's legitimate
rationale for termination was a pretext for pregnancy discrimination.
Employee also failed to show other employees were not subjected to
the same level of investigation for similar conduct. Grant of summary
judgment on Title VII claim is affirmed. As for the FMLA retaliation claim,
employee provided sufficient evidence of her FMLA claim and established a
causal connection between her protected activity and termination to make out
a prima facie case, but failed to establish employer's proffered non-
retaliatory reasons was pretextual. District court erred in failing to
separately analyze Missouri Human Rights Act claim and whether the pregnancy
was a contributing factor in her termination. Jurisdiction over this state
law claim is proper under diversity jurisdiction and the claim is
remanded for trial.