DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

101665P.pdf   03/31/2011  Charity Wierman  v.  Casey's General Stores
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-1665
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Chief Judge Riley and Beam, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - employment discrimination. Employee's evidence neither undermines nor permits a reasonable inference that employer's legitimate rationale for termination was a pretext for pregnancy discrimination. Employee also failed to show other employees were not subjected to the same level of investigation for similar conduct. Grant of summary judgment on Title VII claim is affirmed. As for the FMLA retaliation claim, employee provided sufficient evidence of her FMLA claim and established a causal connection between her protected activity and termination to make out a prima facie case, but failed to establish employer's proffered non- retaliatory reasons was pretextual. District court erred in failing to separately analyze Missouri Human Rights Act claim and whether the pregnancy was a contributing factor in her termination. Jurisdiction over this state law claim is proper under diversity jurisdiction and the claim is remanded for trial.