DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

101689P.pdf   06/17/2011  Alpine Glass, Inc.  v.  Illinois Farmers Ins. Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-1689
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bright and Colloton,
   Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Minnesota Auto Glass Replacement Litigation. Alpine's practice of releasing insureds from any obligation to pay the difference between the amount the insurer greed to pay and the price Alpine charged for glass replacement did not violate the Minnesota's anti-incentive statute; insurer's blast fax setting the amount it would pay for replacements did not form a valid, enforceable unilateral contract; arbitrator correctly applied the competitive price standard set forth in the applicable endorsement and Minnesota law.