DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

102059P.pdf   06/06/2011  Toni Martise  v.  Michael J. Astrue
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-2059
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Loken, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Social Security. Physician's post-hearing letter did not
   contain any additional information and was not relied upon in the decision
   making process, and its receipt did not violate claimant's due process
   rights; ALJ did not err in finding claimant retained the residual functional
   capacity to perform certain kinds of low-stress work; no error in decision 
   not to order a consultative examination regarding claimant's mental
   impairments; hypothetical question posed to the Vocational Expert
   adequately addressed impairments supported by the record.