102281P.pdf   08/17/2011  Fair Isaac Corporation  v.  Experian Information Solutions
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-2281
                          and No:  10-2409
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - antitrust - trademark. District court did not err in dismissing
   antitrust claim of Fair Isaac Corporation for failing to show antitrust
   injury that would entitled it to seek damages under sec. 4 of the Clayton
   Act or injunctive relief under section 16. District court did not erred in
   concluding the registered "300-850" mark was merely descriptive. Jury's
   findings that FICO made false representation during trademark
   registration process, that FICO knew the representations were false, and
   that the trademark office relied on the false representations were
   supported by the evidence. District court's denial of motion for judgment
   as a matter of law on claim of licensee estoppel is affirmed, as
   VantageScore is not a licensee and not estopped from challenging the
   mark under a theory of agency or equity. Dismissal of false advertising
   claim is affirmed as the statement was not literally or implicitly false.
   District court did not abuse its discretion in denying attorneys fees.