DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

102412P.pdf   06/28/2011  St. Charles Tower, Inc.  v.  Robert Kurtz
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-2412
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd,
   Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. The district court erred in refusing to vacate the consent
   judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) as the
   consent judgment requires the defendants to issue a conditional use permit
   without following the procedural requirements imposed by County's
   Unified Land Use Regulations, thereby violating state law; the consent
   judgment was not necessary to remedy an alleged violation of the
   Telecommunications Act of 1995. Judge Shepherd, concurring in part and
   dissenting in part.