102434P.pdf   08/24/2012  Terrick Nooner  v.  Ray Hobbs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-2434
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Bye, Circuit Judge, and Smith
   Camp, District Judge]
   Prisoner case - habeas. For the court's opinion in Nooner's first habeas
   action, see Nooner v. Norris, 402 F.3d 801 (8th Cir. 2005). District court
   did not err in finding that the expert testimony upon which Nooner's
   successive habeas relied was not new evidence; nor did the court err in
   finding the evidence provided by certain witnesses in connection with
   Nooner's actual innocence claim was not credible or reliable; having
   determined that Nooner's evidence is not reliable or new, it is
   unnecessary for the court to conduct a further Schlup analysis; in the
   alternative, considering the proffered evidence in the context of the trial
   evidence, the evidence was not particularly convincing and would have
   been easily marginalized; as a result, Nooner failed to show that it was
   more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found him guilty
   beyond a reasonable doubt.