DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

103060P.pdf   04/21/2011  United States  v.  Antonio Frausto
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-3060
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case - sentence. District court did not procedurally err in imposing two-level enhancement for role in the offense because there was testimony identifying defendant as speaker in recorded phone calls and phone calls revealed defendant planned and organized delivery of methamphetamine between confidential source and two co-conspirators. Denial of safety-valve relief was not error based on his qualification for section 3B1.1(c) enhancement. Sentence was not substantively unreasonable based on sentencing disparity with defendants in unrelated cases because he was not similarly situated to those defendants or his co- defendants.