DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

103587P.pdf   07/14/2011  United States  v.  Joseph Paul Young
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-3587
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law and Sentencing. The district court did not
   err in admitting evidence of two uncharged bank robberies as the evidence
   was admissible to prove identity and the jury was properly instructed on
   use of the evidence; district court properly rejected defendant's assertion
   that there is a preference in the Guidelines for sentences to run
   concurrently to undischarged sentences; district court considered the
   relevant circumstances in deciding to make only a portion of defendant's
   federal sentences concurrent with an undischarged West Virginia
   sentence; sentence was not substantively unreasonable.