103625P.pdf   02/21/2012  Best Buy Stores  v.  Benderson-Wainberg Associates
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-3625
                          and No:  10-3627
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Murphy and Bye, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Contracts. District court did not err in finding defendants'
   interpretation of the leases in question was unreasonable and that they
   breached the leases by failing to obtain insurance in accordance with the
   leases' requirements; there were disputed issues of fact concerning Best
   Buy's knowledge of the particular insurance program, and the court erred
   in rejecting defendants' equitable defenses for the years 1999-2004 and in
   granting Best Buy summary judgment on its claim for those years; district
   court did not err in granting Best Buy summary judgment, however, on 
   its breach of contract claims for 2005-2009; district court did not abuse its
   discretion by dismissing Best Buy's remaining fraud claims with prejudice.