103668P.pdf   07/29/2011  United States  v.  Edward Joseph Lowen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  10-3668
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Loken and Beam, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. A reasonable person in defendant's
   position would have felt at liberty to terminate the interrogation and cause
   the officers to leave, and, as a result, defendant was not in custody at the
   time of his interrogation and his statements, made without Miranda
   warnings, were admissible; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's
   bank robbery conviction; any error in allowing an officer, called by
   defendant, to testify on cross-examination by the government that
   defendant looked like the person on a videotape of the robbery was
   harmless in light of the other identification testimony in the case.