DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

111079P.pdf   11/16/2011  United States  v.  Michael Buck
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1079
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. District court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea as the record showed he received effective assistance of counsel and was not coerced into a plea; nor was there any basis to conclude that defendant's plea was not made voluntarily and knowingly; plea had a factual basis; district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for appointment of new counsel where defendant had received effective assistance and made a knowing choice to proceed pro se; court's sentencing intent was evident from its oral pronouncement, and there was no conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence.