111161P.pdf   07/22/2011  United States  v.  Paul Riesselman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1161
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Melloy, Circuit Judge, and Smith
   Camp, District Judge]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Search warrant was sufficiently particular
   as the attachment to the warrant included a full list of items subject to
   seizure, and the attachment was present at the search; even if failure to
   provide defendant with a copy of the attachment at the time of the search
   violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(f)(1)(C), the violation was
   not a basis for suppressing the seized evidence as the officers; conduct
   was not reckless and no prejudice ensued; while search of defendant's
   person may have been illegal, there was no nexus between the search and
   his incriminating statements; even if there was a nexus, the statements
   were sufficiently attenuated from the search such that they were
   voluntary.