DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

111695P.pdf   03/05/2012  United States  v.  Juan Elodio-Benitez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1695
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - sentence. District court did not abuse its discretion in
   failing to grant a greater downward variance. Resentencing in light of
   United States v. Jimenez-Perez is unwarranted because lack of a fast-
   track program is not a basis for departure and district court did not plainly
   err in failing to comment sua sponte of that issue.