111793P.pdf   03/13/2012  United States  v.  Stephen Morais
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1793
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith and Gruender, Circuit
   Judges]
   Criminal Case - sentence. Sentence as low end of guideline range for
   receiving child pornography was not unreasonable. The record included
   sufficient reasons to reject a downward departure or variance and
   consideration of the impact of defendant's autism diagnosis. District
   court did not clearly err in imposing a fine based on the defendant's
   income, earning capacity and financial resources. Because oral
   pronouncement and written judgment conflict with respect to condition of
   supervised release, case is remanded to amend written judgment to
   conform to oral pronouncement of special condition. Special condition
   four restricting access to the internet without prior approval was
   sufficiently narrow and does not involve a greater deprivation of liberty
   than is reasonably necessary.