DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

111799P.pdf   08/28/2012  Chandramouli Vaidyanathan  v.  Seagate US LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1799
                          and No:  11-1888
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Smith,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case. In action alleging violation of Minnesota statute forbidding
   false statements as inducement to entering employment, the district
   court's instructions were erroneous because they did not properly instruct
   the jury that the employer must know that its representations to the
   applicant were false; in light of the reversal, the district court's order
   dismissing plaintiff's promissory estoppel claim must also be reversed;
   award of attorneys' fees to plaintiff is reversed. Judge Smith, dissenting.